Here's why it makes me sad. I don't think the job was easy. You couldn't use directions like the rest of the split conferences because there was no east-west or north-south line. And you couldn't do a junior/senior thing, pitting the original 6 old Western Conference teams against the most recent 6, because the divisions, mind-blowingly, weren't set up that way. (PLEASE: Can anyone explain why the divisions weren't split this way? If the argument was for competitive balance, I think Western Conference original 6--Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Purdue, Minnesota, and Northwestern-- versus the newer 6--the rest--would've been plenty balanced.) So, it was going to be a tricky proposition from jump. But, instead of really digging into the history of the conference, and finding something awesome, they rolled over and said, "Well, we have history, and we're frontrunners on some stuff," and then went like a quarter-step further than calling the divisions History and Frontrunners.
Then they blew it AGAIN on the new logo. There may never be a logo as clever as the hidden 11 in the old Big Ten logo, so, again they were fighting an uphill battle. But, please click here to see the new one and come back. I'll wait. Did you see it? The 1G? According to the Big Ten, the idea behind the B1G TEN logo is that the "1G" resembles a "10," paying homage to the original ten members. Doesn't the "TEN" do that! It's like nobody told these guys that the conference wasn't changing its name to the Big Twelve (in which case the hidden "10" could've been brilliant).
Also, how mad is Legend's bar in Champaign right now (Hint: the Illini are in the Leaders division)? I'm betting quite to very....
Thanks for having me read a sports blog and making me angry. On the other hand, kudos on the inordinate amount of old-timey photos incorporated here.
ReplyDeleteThe Pistons use the horse in an homage to horse-power
ReplyDelete